0000747689

~24

Phyfica Di(p. VI

bet

conucniceid ipfom , rcC\mdum

i\\uJ

pcinc1pillln>

din de

omr11,v.g.qma Petro conuenit cíle animal

ra–

tion~le

non f'1t1onc

P~trcitatis,

qua: eíl: diffcrentia ip- ,

lius.led pot1us ratione hominiscomcaél:i per pctceita–

tcm , & com1eniemis Ioanni,

Paulo;ctiam loanni,

Paulo nccefl'ar10 deber conuenin:

elfo

animal ra–

tiona\e.: fcd vn1oni integra\i, q11arcnus vnio,

fob

ratione vnio111s conucn1t compkrc partes , & ponerc

i\las in í\atu completo , ac proinde in íl:atu torali, hoc

d1:

in toto , & in comp\ero : ergo ctiam dcbct conue–

n1re vnioni eilemiah cano rotalizandi , poncnd1 in ro–

to,& complend1 partes;ira ve raltm rationcm compll!–

di cmmahat vnio clfcmialis: pee diffcrcntiam cl!Cn–

tialcm in ordine ad marcriam, & formam , fcu pactes

elfenuales:ergo ex vi vnionis e!fcmialis, quatenus di–

íl:inguimr

tenia i\la entirate fuperaddita omnibus

Pª'.tibus íimul ÍUmpris , & vnitis totalizantur partes

clknnalcs ,

tomm clfcntiale coníl:ituimr in

elfe

ro–

tius ; ergo fuperf\ua ef\ alia totalitas,quia fruí\ra fiunt

per plura,qux poffnnt fieri pcr pauciora.

Diccs,vnionem integralcm non ex vi rationis vnio–

nisconuenientis cum vnione dlCnriali , [ed potius ex

vid1ffcrcnti<e intcgra\is

dlt:

totahmem.

Sed contra , hanc (olutio11em redeunt, fine dubio

argumenta nuper pofita • quibus cuidenter demon–

ltramm eíl: totalizare panes non connenire vnio–

ni integrali racione diffcrentia: talis vnionis , fcd

potius ratione conc.cptus vnicndicontralti per diffc–

rentiam.

Secundo enidentius labefaélo hanc íolm!onem,

quia in compofito intcgrali,

in compofito eílcmia–

datur ratio totius

qua conueniunt ram tornm ef–

fentiale , qnam inregrale, & nihilominus non con–

ucniunr per d1fferent1am inrcgcalis :ergo conueniunt

íolúm per tationcm communcm contraél:am per diffc–

rentias effentialis, & integralis , quia quod conuenit

vni rationc differentia: , nullo modo poteíl: conuenire

a!teri dilfcrenti ex vi talis diffecenria: , ve! difHnél:i ex

vi i\lius ab co quod haber ralem differentiam, vt iam

fu:pe demonfüaui,& p_atct i.n homine ,

equo : ergo

ratio tot1us

111

toco mtegcalt non cohuenit illi rationc

diffcrenri<e ; nequc coníl:imitur in ratione rotiuscon–

uemcntis cum roto effentiali pcr diffcrentiam inteara–

lis, fed potius per rationem communem contra&'am

pcr talem diff<rcnriam .fcd romm integrale confiimi–

rur per rotalitarem in effe totius: ergo per totalitarem,

qua: non prollcniat

differcmia integralis, fed potius

prouenientcm

racione communi ipfi cocí

intcgr~li,

roti eífentiali exillenccm veré,

realirer formalif–

íime

in vrroquc toto ,

racio ell euidcns , quia non

potcíl: dari concretum formaliffimc,.Jcn ratio concreti

iodnobns extremis, nili deturctiam' in eifdem ratio

formalis conllirutiua concreti , quia ta!is ratio form.i–

!is

eíl: de e!fentia concrcti,q11ate11us cale ell;

nde quia

111

Petro,

Paulo dame rario hominis,& in homine,

pariere datur ratio albi , 1in vtrifque rerminis com–

paracisdebet dari albedo,

hnmanitas,qu:e eífcntia–

lircr conf\imunt calia concrel'lolalias concreta fine

íua

eífcnria exillerent,quod cíl: omnino chyma:rium;imo

quia Pcrrus,lk Pan\us com1enjnnt in ratione hominis,

debcnt necc!fario conucnire etiam in racione forma–

¡¡

conllitutiua hominis,humanitate videlicet, vtde fe

patet.Ex

quo colligimr;quod ficuc ratio hominis non

pconcnitin Petro

petreitate, quia ratio homi1;is ·eíl.

ratio conlienicndi cnm Paulo,& ratio connenicndi nó

pote!\: prog.redi

racione

differ~ndi,

alias vnum oppo–

Gtum ab aho proflueretata Gm1hrcr ratio coní\icmiua

hon~in~s

non potcíl: prouenire

rationc qux eíl: diffe–

renna 1n Pen:o,q_ux

~on

reperirur in Paulo,fcd potius

deber proue111re a ranone communi, & vt melius lo–

quar,dcbet effe ratio comruunis Perro,

Paulo¡ quis

Compofl10

naturali.

e1iim pote!\: etiam ccecuciens diccre hurnanítatem có–

fiirmiuam Pctri in

e!Te

horninis cum Paulo coníl:Hui

pcr pctreitatem aut conuenire Perro racione pctrcita–

t1s,q11re mi111mc repemur in Paulo , fed potius eíl: id,

per quod Perros d1tfcrr

Paulo?

Tune fic; Ratio cotius formaliffiml: intrin[e.:c ,

propric conuenit cocí clfcnttali,& inrcgrali: ergo ctiá

vmque conuc111r

exiíl:it in vrroqne forrnaliter to–

talitas;qua: eíl: coníl:1tuciuun1 rotius,

ficur ratio

10-

ti11s

elt

ratio conueniendi totius eflcntialis, c11m ro-

to intcgrah :ita cti:im tomlitas cíl: rario,pcr quam có-

11enictorum intcgrale cum roto eílcntiah: ergo ncque

ratio rotius neq11e ratio toralitatis in integrali poceíl:

conuenire 1\li ratione alicuius differerrtia: lolurn cxi–

nentis in roco,& intcgrali,& qua: rninirnc conurniat

eífenriali , fcd por1us debet conuenite incegrali racio-

ne alicnius formalitatis conucnicmisetiam rol! efTcn–

ciali; íicm v.g. hornini non conuenit fentire racione

rationalitatis, qua: non reperitur in cquo,fed potius ra–

tione animalitatis , qua: in vrroque repcrirnr, &

racione pr:edicati communis vtriquc;tunc

lic

roti inte–

grali conuenit ratio totalitatis non proprcr panes,q11ia

1pfa: funr materiale , quod toralizatur, nec rationc

tcrtia: entitatis,qua: in tali roro non datur : ergo ref\ac

folum,quod conneniat tori inregrali ,

r~tio

totalirads

propter vnionem totalizamem,& coníl:ituentem par-

tes in nam totius;arqni non poreíl: conuenire ratio ro–

taliraris,vr Ge racione taleiratis,

diffcrentire vnionis

integralis, quia illa ex co quod d1ffdeotia fit,minimi:

reperirur in coto eflenuali; vbi darur fine dubio ratio

toralitaris,vt íic,imo eíl: differcnria, per quam totum

imegra\e vnirnm,& compofimm d1ftert a toro cfTen–

ciah compoliro : ergo euidenrer fequitur rotum inte–

gra le haberc rarioncm totalitatis,

rotius ve fic,non

per diffoentiam v nionis integralis", fcd

p~ti~s

PC:r:

ra–

tionem communem vnionis,

compofit10111s.: tta ve

idem lit in toto intcgrali rora\izatio,vt fic, ac vnio,vt

fic,ac proinde idem lit in :oto integra\i

con~eptus

có–

pofiti,& vniri ex parribus ac conceptus

to~1us,

íic;

vnde idem erit totum,ac completum confücurnm,

compofüum.

Declaratur , quia horno,

Angclus conuenium

in rationc intellcéliui vt lic,& talis ratio nó porell có–

ucnire homini, am Angelo ratione

diffcrenuarmn.f~cl

porius ratione prxdicat1

communi~ conuemem~s

vm–

que;{ed rhio totius,vr fic abílraélt ab

mteg~al!,&

ef–

fcnriali conuenit roti in•egrali,

ron etTcnnali : ergo

euidemer fcquimr talem rationcm rocins,vt fic,am ro–

talitatis,vr Ge, non connen11e roti integrali rarione il–

lius,quod non habet rotum dlCmiale,(ed porius ratio-

nc pr:cdicati communis vtrique,ac proinde non racione

differentia: iotegralis,

e contra ratio totius , vt fic

conuenit toti ef!entiali,& integrali : ergo non conue-

nit toti efTemiali racione :ilicuius furmalitatis , qua:

minimc reperiarur in roto integrali,& per qnam dif–

fi:rat ab illo,fed potilts deber conuenirc illi

erre

tolllm,

habere rocalicarem per pra-dicat111n,& formahratem

exiíl:cntem in roto integrali formaliffime, arqui

tcn.ia

encitasdiltinél:a

partibus'

vnione fimul fumprts,

vnitis non datur vilo modo in roto integrali , quod

per totalitatem confüruitur in !·acionc cornmnni to–

cius: ergo totum elTentiale non confütuimr in ra.rione

torlns vt fic, per tcrriam e

'1tirnrem.vt

fic,nc.que

111

r~·

tione talis torius per ralem tcrnarn enmatcm d1-

ílinél:am ab omnibus pacibns fimul furnptis ,

vnitis.

Euidentius demonllratur bxc veritas, quia vcl ro–

tum ellenriale coníl:imimr in ratione communi rotius

per aliquid,quod 1;on

ell

in ipfo formalircr

vcl pcr a–

liquid,qnod in iplo formaliter reperitur.Pnmum

n.ul

lo modo dici pocelt , quia concrernm debet coní\mu

fiue